NOTICE: All content on the Autodesk Sustainability Workshop has been incorporated into the new Autodesk Design Academy website. Visit the Design Academy's Sustainable Design landing page to find the relocated content, and explore the new site. Note: The Autodesk Sustainability Workshop will be taken down on June 30, 2015.

Building Design

Human Thermal Comfort

Energy-efficient buildings are only effective when the occupants of the buildings are comfortable. If they are not comfortable, then they will take alternative means of heating or cooling a space such as space heaters or window-mounted air conditioners that could be substantially worse than typical Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems.

Thermal comfort is difficult to measure because it is highly subjective. It depends on the air temperature, humidity, radiant temperature, air velocity, metabolic rates, and clothing levels and each individual experiences these sensations a bit differently based on his or her physiology and state. 

According to the ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010, thermal comfort is defined as “that condition of mind which expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment and is assessed by subjective evaluation1.”Also known as human comfort, thermal comfort is the occupants’ satisfaction with the surrounding thermal conditions and is essential to consider when designing a structure that will be occupied by people.

A cold sensation will be pleasing when the body is overheated, but unpleasant when the core is already cold. At the same time, the temperature of the skin is not uniform on all areas of the body. There are variations in different parts of the body which reflect the variations in blood flow and subcutaneous fat. The insulative quality of clothing also has a marked effect on the level and distribution of skin temperature. Thus, sensation from any particular part of the skin will depend on time, location and clothing, as well as the temperature of the surroundings.

 

Factors in Human Comfort

There are six factors to take into consideration when designing for thermal comfort. Its determining factors include the following:

  • Metabolic rate (met): The energy generated from the human body
  • Clothing insulation (clo): The amount of thermal insulation the person is wearing
  • Air temperature: Temperature of the air surrounding the occupant
  • Radiant temperature: The weighted average of all the temperatures from surfaces surrounding an occupant
  • Air velocity: Rate of air movement given distance over time
  • Relative humidity: Percentage of water vapor in the air

The environmental factors include temperature, radiant temperature, relative humidity, and air velocity. The personal factors are activity level (metabolic rate) and clothing.

Thermal comfort is calculated as a heat transfer energy balance. Heat transfer through radiation, convection, and conduction are balanced against the occupant’s metabolic rate. The heat transfer occurs between the environment and the human body, which has an area of 19 ft2.  If the heat leaving the occupant is greater than the heat entering the occupant, the thermal perception is “cold.” If the heat entering the occupant is greater than the heat leaving the occupant, the thermal perception is “warm” or “hot.”

A method of describing thermal comfort was developed by Ole Fanger and is referred to as Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD). 

 

Predicted Mean Vote

The Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) refers to a thermal scale that runs from Cold (-3) to Hot (+3), originally developed by Fanger and later adopted as an ISO standard. The original data was collected by subjecting a large number of people (reputedly many thousands of Israeli soldiers) to different conditions within a climate chamber and having them select a position on the scale the best described their comfort sensation. A mathematical model of the relationship between all the environmental and physiological factors considered was then derived from the data. The result relates the size thermal comfort factors to each other through heat balance principles and produces the following sensation scale. 

Predicted Mean Vote sensation scale
Value Sensation
-3 Cold
-2 Cool
-1 Slightly cool
0 Neutral
1 Slightly warm
2 Warm
3 Hot

 

The recommended acceptable PMV range for thermal comfort from ASHRAE 55 is between -0.5 and +0.5 for an interior space.

Use the widget below to get an intuitive sense for the factors that play into human comfort, and what makes us too hot or too cold. Drag the sliders with your mouse to experiment with different values and try to stay within the -0.5 and +0.5 range.

 


Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied

Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD) predicts the percentage of occupants that will be dissatisfied with the thermal conditions. It is a function of PMV, given that as PMV moves further from 0, or neutral, PPD increases. The maximum number of people dissatisfied with their comfort conditions is 100% and, as you can never please all of the people all of the time, the recommended acceptable PPD range for thermal comfort from ASHRAE 55 is less than 10% persons dissatisfied for an interior space.

 

The Math behind PMV & PPD

PMV is arguably the most widely used thermal comfort index today. The ISO Standard 7730 (ISO 1984), "Moderate Thermal Environments - Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort," uses limits on PMV as an explicit definition of the comfort zone.

The PMV equation only applies to humans exposed for a long period to constant conditions at a constant metabolic rate. 

Fanger’s thermal comfort model is used to calculate PMV in the following equation2.

With

Where         

e Euler’s number (2.718)
fcl clothing factor
hc convective heat transfer coefficient
Icl clothing insulation [clo]
M metabolic rate [W/m2] 115 for all scenarios
pa vapor pressure of air [kPa]
Rcl clothing thermal insulation
ta air temperature [°C]
tcl surface temperature of clothing  [°C]
tr mean radiant temperature [°C]
V air velocity [m/s]
W external work (assumed = 0)

 

Since PPD is a function of PMV, it can be defined as

 

Adaptive Comfort

Adaptive comfort models add a little more human behaviour to the mix. They assume that, if changes occur in the thermal environment to produce discomfort, then people will generally change their behaviour and act in a way that will restore their comfort. Such actions could include taking off clothing, reducing activity levels or even opening a window. The main effect of such models is to increase the range of conditions that designers can consider as comfortable, especially in naturally ventilated buildings where the occupants have a greater degree of control over their thermal environment.

In order to consider adaptive comfort, the space must have operable windows, no mechanical cooling system, and the occupants must be near sedentary and have a metabolic rate between 1.0 and 1.3 met. Also, occupants have the option of adding or removing clothing to adapt to the thermal conditions.

Table 1 - The effect of adaptive behaviors on optimum comfort temperatures. Taken from BRE
BEHAVIOR EFFECT OFFSET
Jumper/Jacket on or off Changes Clo by ± 0.35 ± 2.2K
Tight fit/Loose fit clothing Changes Clo by ± 0.26 ± 1.7K
Collar and tie on or off Changes Clo by ± 0.13 ± 0.8K
Office chair type Changes Clo by ± 0.05 ± 0.3K
Seated or walking around Varies Met by ± 0.4 ± 3.4K
Stress level Varies Met by ± 0.3 ± 2.6K
Vigour of activity Varies Met by ± 0.1 ± 0.9K
Different postures Varies Met by ± 10% ± 0.9K
Consume cold drink Varies Met by -0.12 + 0.9K
Consume hot drink/food Varies Met by +0.12 - 0.9K
Operate desk fan Varies Vel by +2.0m/s + 2.8K
Operate ceiling fan Varies Vel by +1.0m/s + 2.2K
Open window Varies Vel by +0.5m/s + 1.1K

 

1ASHRAE. 2010. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2010. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.

2Fanger, P.O. 1970. ­Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

Comments

Sustainable Design

Everything in the built environment is designed, from the smallest computer chip to the largest city. With Autodesk software, users can reduce the environmental impacts of their designs.  Visit the Autodesk Sustainable Design Center: autodesk.com/sustainabledesign.

YouTube Channel